Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions
Moeller example
(suggestion to Anthere: resign, you are best not associated with these people, who are going to be disenfranchised soon) |
(Moeller example) |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
:::With literally dozens of liars and thugs and libellers and [[spin doctor]]s running around removing all links to the sources, deleting them, etc. it is your responsibility, not our responsibility, to keep these [[Talk page]] comments visible so that the people who issue the threats and make the ad hominem arguments can be kept out of the [[sysop power structure]]. It was MANY times restated by [[Erik Moeller]] that those who reinstated [[troll text]] would be themselves subject to [[IP block]]s. But Moeller remains a sysop so this must be considered "policy" on your part. | :::With literally dozens of liars and thugs and libellers and [[spin doctor]]s running around removing all links to the sources, deleting them, etc. it is your responsibility, not our responsibility, to keep these [[Talk page]] comments visible so that the people who issue the threats and make the ad hominem arguments can be kept out of the [[sysop power structure]]. It was MANY times restated by [[Erik Moeller]] that those who reinstated [[troll text]] would be themselves subject to [[IP block]]s. But Moeller remains a sysop so this must be considered "policy" on your part. | ||
:::A fairly typical example: "15:22, 1 May 2004, Eloquence blocked Enforcer (expires indefinite) (contribs) (trolling / libel against Wikimedia foundation); ..."; Moeller is equating what he calls "[[trolling]]" with [[libel]] which is a legal threat and an attempt to perform [[social exclusion]] | |||
*''Allegation:'' U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English | *''Allegation:'' U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English | ||