Talk:Consumerium Research pilot: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(liars) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]. | Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]. | ||
Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.'' | Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for a definition of the '''Wikiactivist''' and the role of such activist [[faction]]s in [[text liberation]].'' | ||