Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions

Talk:Ontological distinction(24) (edit)

Revision as of 18:58, 4 July 2004

1,035 bytes added , 4 July 2004

more implications

Anonymous user

142.177.103.67

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting.  If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being.  The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other.  Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]?  God's cognition implies all beings?
-By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s.  The [[operational distinction]]s they make when blocking us in their hate and fear, are interpreted (via [[groupthink]]) as [[ontological distinction]]s by other [[sysop power structure]] apologists, and accepted as precedents in their degraded [[troll-formative injustice]] system, leading to [[Wikimedia corruption]].  It clearly exists.  But what's the source of it?
+By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, [[some body]] treated as [[no body]], banished for resisting GodKingly [[usurper]]s and the [[priestly hierarchy]] they form.
-That corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, in 24's view, creating simple [[groupthink]].  That is probably optimistic though.  There are other theories:  it is lack of [[due process]], or over-tolerance for [[systemic bias]] approved POVs, or under-tolerance of [[New Troll point of view]].  According to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], it is plain and simple political hate.  Probably all these theories have some merits.
+The [[operational distinction]]s the [[sysop]]s make when blocking us in their hate and fear and based on their [[echo chamber]] beliefs, are interpreted (via [[groupthink]]) as [[ontological distinction]]s by other [[sysop power structure]] apologists, and accepted as "precedents" in their degraded [[troll-formative injustice]] system, leading to [[Wikimedia corruption]], among other foul effects:  [[harassment]], [[libel]], and to [[require response to hearsay]].
+[[English Wikipedia User 24]] seemed to imply that corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, creating simple [[groupthink]].  That is probably optimistic though.  There are other theories:  it might be lack of [[due process]], or over-tolerance for [[systemic bias]]-approved POVs (like [[English Wikipedia User RK]]), or under-tolerance of [[New Troll point of view]] (like [[English Wikipedia User JRR_Trollkien]]).  According to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], it is plain and simple political hate, played out in [[politics as usual]].  Probably all these theories have some merits.  Some imply conspiracy, and others, mere idiocy:
+It does not take more than a few encounters with a drooling retard like [[Erik Moeller]] or an autistic robot like [[Angela Beesley]] or a [[technological escalation|nuclear weapon builder]] like [[Tim Starling]] or a gibbering control freak like [[Daniel Mayer]] to realize that they're the kind of people no one actually wants to know, who seek substitute social lives via power in a wiki.  The problem is, how to flush them from the system?  By [[lawsuit]]s that specifically cite their errors and crimes?  By less formal complaints that make others realize systems are more effective without them, than with them?  Or what?