Consumerium:Non-neutral point of view: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*[[Critical point of view]] - including disapproval of the concept itself, and claims that it does not exist; | *[[Critical point of view]] - including disapproval of the concept itself, and claims that it does not exist; | ||
[[Trolls]] argue that '''non-neutral point of view''' itself is merely an invented mechanism used by others to define them as "wrong" - they would prefer that this article be from a very critical POV, and consider | [[Trolls]] argue that '''non-neutral point of view''' itself is merely an invented mechanism used by others to define them as "wrong" - they would prefer that this article be from a very critical POV, and consider its title to be from a: | ||
*[[Sysop Vandal point of view]] - | *[[Sysop Vandal point of view]] - defined by [[trollist]]s as "[[technological escalation|we have more advanced weapons than thou]] point of view"; This will be claimed by [[trollist]]s to prevail in [[Publish Wiki]] as long as there is such a thing as "[[Opinion Wiki]]" which requires vandalism ([[sysop vandalism|someone deciding things are opinions and moving them there]]) and as long as there is more power given to old trolls than to the: | ||
*[[New Troll point of view]] - which claims there is no [[Consumerium:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]]; [[NTPOV]] will likely be attempted to guide us in governing [[Research Wiki]] in order to avoid getting anyone's leg bitten off (ie. being [[troll-friendly]]) | *[[New Troll point of view]] - which claims there is no [[Consumerium:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]]; [[NTPOV]] will likely be attempted to guide us in governing [[Research Wiki]] in order to avoid getting anyone's leg bitten off (ie. being [[troll-friendly]]) | ||
''The troll rhetoric seems to arise naturally in reaction to [[sysopism]] and will probably flare up intensely any time someone makes an assumption of power.'' | |||
=== faction-driven === | === faction-driven === | ||
A less painful way to express the above debate, is that '''Consumerium point of view''' is [[factionally | A less painful way to express the above debate, is that '''Consumerium point of view''' is [[factionally defined]], and that each faction has its own POV that it can agree on ''with others of that faction.'' Each [[Research Wiki]] page is effectively a battleground for [[duelling POV]], and this conflict helps to bring out the truth - in an [[adversarial process]] such as is applied in court. Some things, like the [[process]] itself, or the existence of [[Wikimedia corruption]] may not be disputed, while others, like the role of "[[Opinion Wiki|opinion in research]]", might be hotly disputed, yielding: | ||
* [[Consensual point of view]] - articles where [[faction]] differences are muted | * [[Consensual point of view]] - articles where [[faction]] differences are muted | ||
| Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
Articles might then be divided among a [[Consumerium:Greens|Green]] or [[Consumerium:Pinks|Pink]] or [[Consumerium:Red|Red]] point of view, depending on the factions, but are not reduced to "sympathetic/critical" or "consensual/multiple" as these are not axes that are derived from real values. | Articles might then be divided among a [[Consumerium:Greens|Green]] or [[Consumerium:Pinks|Pink]] or [[Consumerium:Red|Red]] point of view, depending on the factions, but are not reduced to "sympathetic/critical" or "consensual/multiple" as these are not axes that are derived from real values. | ||
''This factional model is [[politics as usual]] as in [[representative democracy]]. It has its problems, but, it's the only thing we agree to run the world on.'' | |||
=== consumer-culture-driven === | === consumer-culture-driven === | ||
[[Governance by Kit-Kat McFlurry]] is yet another management paradigm when whoever has [[controll]] of the [[fast food]] syrup supply and freezer gets to do awful things to whoever they think are [[trolls]] using these mechanisms. | [[Governance by Kit-Kat McFlurry]] is yet another management paradigm when whoever has [[controll]] of the [[fast food]] syrup supply and freezer gets to do awful things to whoever they think are [[trolls]] using these mechanisms. | ||