Talk:Wikipedia (from 142 perspective): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
If you want to view or contribute comments on the Webby Awards website, go there, log in and look under "community" and "best practices" for comments.
If you want to view or contribute comments on the Webby Awards website, go there, log in and look under "community" and "best practices" for comments.


:"The day will come when I will put out the call for funds to distribute paper copies of Wikipedia to every child in every third world country in the world. This, too, is our mission...to achieve those goals will require us to become famous, to become a household name to every single person on the planet. Why? Because to distribute our work to everyone in the world is going to cost an enormous ton of money,...We're taking part in a revolution here, not playing around with a sideline hobby" - Wales.
:"The day will come when I will put out the call for funds to distribute paper copies of Wikipedia to every child in every third world country in the world. This, too, is our mission...to achieve those goals will require us to become famous, to become a household name to every single person on the planet. Why? Because to distribute our work to everyone in the world is going to cost an enormous ton of money,...We're taking part in a revolution here, not playing around with a sideline hobby...I fully intend to get a copy of Wikipedia to every single person on the planet, and I'll do what it takes to get there" - Wales.


:This would be quite dangerous for this planet, given [[w:GDP]] and other far right wing entries, the unbalanced "community" (notice that a group of Jews recently decided the Wikipedia article "Jew" was so favourable to them that they wanted it as the number one hit on google, and arranged that via googlewash) and the deliberate censorship of even mildly green entries.
:This would be extremely dangerous for the planet itself, given [[w:GDP]] and other far right wing entries, the unbalanced "community" (notice that a group of Jews recently decided the Wikipedia article "Jew" was so favourable to them that they wanted it as the number one hit on google, and arranged that via googlewash) and the deliberate censorship of even mildly green entries.


:I'd say Wales must be stopped, now, before he and his clique really do rule the encyclopedia world.  He used to be just an incompetent hobbyist.  Now he wants to be the Bill Gates of content.
:I'd say Wales must be stopped, now, before he and his clique really do rule the encyclopedia world.  He used to be just an incompetent hobbyist.  Now he wants to be the Bill Gates of content.
Anonymous user