Talk:Net domestic product: Difference between revisions

more evidence of corruption - sysop vandalism of key economic concepts - time for ending Wikimedia?
No edit summary
 
(more evidence of corruption - sysop vandalism of key economic concepts - time for ending Wikimedia?)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


If you have already ensured that the article on [[w:gross domestic product]] has appropriate critique and links to [[w:net domestic product]], [[w:measuring well-being]], [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that related articles like [[w:economic growth]] have an up-front critique linked to [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that censorship of links to critics like [[w:Marilyn Waring]] has been undone, THEN you can delink this concept fairly from Wikimedia corruption.
If you have already ensured that the article on [[w:gross domestic product]] has appropriate critique and links to [[w:net domestic product]], [[w:measuring well-being]], [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that related articles like [[w:economic growth]] have an up-front critique linked to [[w:uneconomic growth]], and that censorship of links to critics like [[w:Marilyn Waring]] has been undone, THEN you can delink this concept fairly from Wikimedia corruption.
:An attempt today to do just this was met by the usual [[sysop vandalism]].  It thus is obviously still a problem, and begins to suggest that [[ending Wikimedia]] is the only rational course for those who care about these issues.


Until you have done all that, the issue stands as evidence of their corruption and [[EPOV]].
Until you have done all that, the issue stands as evidence of their corruption and [[EPOV]].
Anonymous user