Funded troll: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those who fund them. A [[friendly troll]] may be a funded troll, but probably only if they are paid by the [[Green Party]] or [[Greenpeace]] or some [[animal rights]] or [[Great Ape Personhood]] or [[vegan]] group. And those have no money, so it's unlikely. | '''Funded troll'''s are paid to change opinions in the [[Opinion Wiki]] or alter the way that the project works in ways that favour those who fund them. | ||
A [[friendly troll]] may be a funded troll, but probably only if they are paid by the [[Green Party]] or [[Greenpeace]] or some [[animal rights]] or [[Great Ape Personhood]] or [[vegan]] group. And those have no money, so it's unlikely. | |||
To [[con-troll]] these, a system of [[bet]]s like a [[Consumerium Prediction Market]] may be required. Wishful thinking is that they are never required, and that no funded trolls will appear. This seems really unlikely if [[marketing]] starts to depend heavily on the [[Opinion Wiki]] here or other traits of [[Consumerium:Itself]]. | |||
If such a prediction market is operating, funding trolls makes less sense than just betting. And bets can be seen, and provide useful signals and information about resistance to changes, while trolls make a living out of being hard to track and trace (like using many IP numbers moin moin!) | |||