Extraction and disposal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(our most basic model? please help identify ideas in here, and move them to talk) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
**[[social capital]] is the balance of trust that makes all the above work, and prevents [[legal struggle]] which would bring in unwanted parties, e.g. lawyers, who would come to the table with "ideas", which would be bad. Very bad. Soal capital has an [[bad side of social capital|bad side]] as well. Things like a [[deed in land]] or [[right to pollute]] are totally social capital issues. | **[[social capital]] is the balance of trust that makes all the above work, and prevents [[legal struggle]] which would bring in unwanted parties, e.g. lawyers, who would come to the table with "ideas", which would be bad. Very bad. Soal capital has an [[bad side of social capital|bad side]] as well. Things like a [[deed in land]] or [[right to pollute]] are totally social capital issues. | ||
**[[individual capital]] is ability to creatively resolve disputes. This is the [[CGO board]] role. They should be people who look only at extraction of [[individual capital]] from the [[talent base]] of [[trolls]] and from them co-opt help with the [[rule by trolls]] that emerges on any [[open campaign]]. A good example is how [[act.greenpeace.org]] does it. A good model for us, especially their anonymity policy. | **[[individual capital]] is ability to creatively resolve disputes. This is the [[CGO board]] role. They should be people who look only at extraction of [[individual capital]] from the [[talent base]] of [[trolls]] and from them co-opt help with the [[rule by trolls]] that emerges on any [[open campaign]]. A good example is how [[act.greenpeace.org]] does it. A good model for us, especially their anonymity policy. | ||
*[[financial capital]] is a measure of wastefulness. That is, if you have [[money]], you can throw something away that you would otherwise [[re-use]] or [[trade]]. A perfect [[money supply system]] rewards only habits of extreme and paranoid conservation, not of money, but of [[natural capital]] (avoiding pollution) and [[instructional capital]] (avoiding ideas, which are the pollution of thought) and [[social capital]] (not being too offensive if it can be avoided). All money ideally would come from turning waste into resources. | |||
A perfect statement of the above would be [[instructional capital]] that would let even [[trolls, ascendant]], run [[Consumerium]] alone with no [[CGO]] at all. This would be like Earth running itself with no "help" from humans. | A perfect statement of the above would be [[instructional capital]] that would let even [[trolls, ascendant]], run [[Consumerium]] alone with no [[CGO]] at all. This would be like Earth running itself with no "help" from humans. | ||
It is all a matter of seeing extraction and disposal as the same natural process, and thinking like a [[troll]]: living under the bridge only on garbage thrown down by [[human]] wastrels. Maybe barking at them nastily if they throw down [[nuclear waste]] or something else inedible even to fairly tough trolls. | It is all a matter of seeing extraction and disposal as the same natural process, and thinking like a [[troll]]: living under the bridge only on garbage thrown down by [[human]] wastrels. Maybe barking at them nastily if they throw down [[nuclear waste]] or something else inedible even to fairly tough trolls. |