Evil: Difference between revisions

39 bytes added ,  4 December 2003
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:


Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]].  How [[fair]] could such a definition be?  At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected.  [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.'''''  Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]].
Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]].  How [[fair]] could such a definition be?  At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected.  [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.'''''  Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]].
''See also'': [[extreme standards]]
11

edits