11
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]]. How [[fair]] could such a definition be? At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected. [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.''''' Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]]. | Still, some claim '''evil''' can be objectively and globally defined and that at least some of what is [[not evil]] could be detected by some [[audit]]. How [[fair]] could such a definition be? At the very least it would have to satisfy participants and observers that their own ideas of what is [[safe]] and [[done]] are respected. [[Faction]]s make it impossible to settle on one strict and global definition, so this is a '''''[[contested term]] - see [[glossary]] for other such contested terms.''''' Probably it is best to consider '''evil''' to be [[factionally defined]]. | ||
''See also'': [[extreme standards]] |
edits