Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions
more proof of corruption: the worst vandals and vigilantes come in first in the "election" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
And the only non-[[sysop vandalism|vandal]], [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], barely beat a [[sysop vigilantiism|vigilante]] for the job! It is obvious that the next "election" will simply put one of the fascists in place, and that they use their [[sysop power structure]] to gain votes for themselves. | And the only non-[[sysop vandalism|vandal]], [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], barely beat a [[sysop vigilantiism|vigilante]] for the job! It is obvious that the next "election" will simply put one of the fascists in place, and that they use their [[sysop power structure]] to gain votes for themselves. | ||
[http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000371.html Fagcist] [[Daniel Mayer]] exploited the above to argue that [[Erik Moeller]] have a special "Gestapo" position created for himself to undermine the authority of [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], a predictable tactic. | |||