Consumerium:We: Difference between revisions
(reflexive tracking of "who we are" and what "we" say about that) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Any statement about '''who we are''' thus must be examined by every participant, so they can qualify, edit, object, or change it. | Any statement about '''who we are''' thus must be examined by every participant, so they can qualify, edit, object, or change it. | ||
To facilitate this, please include a link to [[Consumerium:We]] directly in the text or talk page of any article that you think is saying something about '''who we are'''. This makes it easier to track these statements. | To facilitate this, please include a link to [[Consumerium:We]] directly in the text or talk page of any article that you think is saying something about '''who we are'''. This makes it easier to track these statements. For more background on why this is extremely important see [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=who's_we en: Recyclopedia: who's we]. | ||
A similar protocol applies to all mention of [[Consumerium:Itself]] and any [[Consumerium:Policy]]. | A similar protocol applies to all mention of [[Consumerium:Itself]] and any [[Consumerium:Policy]]. | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 27 March 2004
Who We are at Consumerium is always changing. People drop in, drop out, get invited in, and sometimes even get driven off by trolls (in very nasty cases where those who perform sysop vandalism and then show up here!).
Any statement about who we are thus must be examined by every participant, so they can qualify, edit, object, or change it.
To facilitate this, please include a link to Consumerium:We directly in the text or talk page of any article that you think is saying something about who we are. This makes it easier to track these statements. For more background on why this is extremely important see en: Recyclopedia: who's we.
A similar protocol applies to all mention of Consumerium:Itself and any Consumerium:Policy.