Talk:Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions
(moving Moeller and Starling concerns as they are not officers of Wikimedia) |
(broker a deal?) |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
:how can one libel an organization whose sole purpose seems to be libel? Hmm. | :how can one libel an organization whose sole purpose seems to be libel? Hmm. | ||
----------- | |||
Is it actually acceptable to simply remove [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Daniel Mayer]] publicly? Will those subjected to [[libel]] by these people actually back off if they are publicly removed and Wales apologizes? Or is Wales, himself, the ultimate problem, due to his history as a [[GodKing]] and so on? | |||
[[Trolls]] are unlikely to all agree on this. Perhaps the debate on a [[negotiated settlement between trolls and Wikimedia]] should be very public. | |||
If [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] brokers such a deal, its prestige will rise, and it will effectively be more trusted than [[Wikimedia]] by defn. | |||