Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions
(responding to the false claim that 142 material is non-encyclopedic: statistically, it sticks as often as any other edits, amazing consider how attacked it is) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:This is laughable. [[Wikipedia]] itself is in constant [[GFDL violation]], and the license does *not* require "links back to the Wikipedia original", it requires access to the source text version of the article, which Wikipedia itself does not provide to all users. | :This is laughable. [[Wikipedia]] itself is in constant [[GFDL violation]], and the license does *not* require "links back to the Wikipedia original", it requires access to the source text version of the article, which Wikipedia itself does not provide to all users. | ||
::What articles does it not provide the source for? (r3m0t) | |||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copies_of_Wikipedia_content_(low_degree_of_compliance) here is a list of all the sites they bully and harass into making themselves the centre of the] [[GFDL corpus]] universe. | :[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copies_of_Wikipedia_content_(low_degree_of_compliance) here is a list of all the sites they bully and harass into making themselves the centre of the] [[GFDL corpus]] universe. | ||
------------------- | ------------------- | ||
''the following was added under'' | ''the following was added under'' | ||
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | *false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | ||