Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions
(implications for trolls) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]? God's cognition implies all beings? | The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition ''implies'' being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this [[God's Eye View]]? God's cognition implies all beings? | ||
By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s. | By contrast the [[GodKing]]'s view, or [[community point of view]], implies only [[trolls]], hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly [[usurper]]s. The [[operational distinction]]s they make when blocking us in their hate and fear, are interpreted (via [[groupthink]]) as [[ontological distinction]]s by other [[sysop power structure]] apologists, and accepted as precedents in their degraded [[troll-formative injustice]] system, leading to [[Wikimedia corruption]]. It clearly exists. But what's the source of it? | ||
That corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, in 24's view, creating simple [[groupthink]]. That is probably optimistic though. There are other theories: it is lack of [[due process]], or over-tolerance for [[systemic bias]] approved POVs, or under-tolerance of [[New Troll point of view]]. According to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], it is plain and simple political hate. Probably all these theories have some merits. | |||
Revision as of 18:43, 4 July 2004
This seems like a long-winded and general way of saying what is already said at ontological distinction anyway. This long version belongs in Wikipedia or Wikinfo not here probably.
The "cogito ergo sum" example is interesting. If it is dualism, then, it is separating cognition from being, to say that cognition implies being. The cognition (mind) and the being (body) are separate so that one implies the other. Isn't this God's Eye View? God's cognition implies all beings?
By contrast the GodKing's view, or community point of view, implies only trolls, hated and despised beings, who resist GodKingly usurpers. The operational distinctions they make when blocking us in their hate and fear, are interpreted (via groupthink) as ontological distinctions by other sysop power structure apologists, and accepted as precedents in their degraded troll-formative injustice system, leading to Wikimedia corruption. It clearly exists. But what's the source of it?
That corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, in 24's view, creating simple groupthink. That is probably optimistic though. There are other theories: it is lack of due process, or over-tolerance for systemic bias approved POVs, or under-tolerance of New Troll point of view. According to Wikipedia Red Faction, it is plain and simple political hate. Probably all these theories have some merits.