Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions
(amazing! Wikimedia will not release the complete results of its "election" to the "Board" - of course this proves they are fascists) |
(Wales' unilateral handling of the China crisis without consulting the Board - classic GodKing fascism and proves beyond a doubt that the WBOT is false front) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*withholding [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] election results from the voters! [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000360.html apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and [[Bomis]] | *withholding [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] election results from the voters! [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000360.html apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and [[Bomis]] | ||
*no [[independent board]] free of influence from [[Bomis.com]] | |||
*no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board" | |||
*"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000384.html in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China], which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the [[GodKing]] unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on [[usual happy NPOV talk]]." This was less than one day after the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question. | |||
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | *false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | ||
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]] | *[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]] | ||
*users not consulted when user environment changes | *users not consulted when user environment changes | ||
*[[libel chill]] by Wales | *[[libel chill]] by Wales | ||
*solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines | *solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines | ||
Revision as of 20:51, 16 June 2004
Evidence of Wikimedia corruption includes:
- withholding Wikimedia Board of Trustees election results from the voters! apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo the GodKing of Wikimedia and Bomis
- no independent board free of influence from Bomis.com
- no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
- "Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China, which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the GodKing unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on usual happy NPOV talk." This was less than one day after the "election" of Wikimedia Board of Trustees who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
- false claims added to Wikimedia article here, and true claims removed
- technological escalation against Recyclopedia and threatened against Wikinfo
- users not consulted when user environment changes
- libel chill by Wales
- solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
- withholding of information regarding link transit at Wikipedia which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a search engine like Bomis
- outing and concomitant libel based on echo chamber claims
- sysop vandalism most notably by Auntie Angela
- sysop vigilantiism and more serious developer vigilantiism, notably by Tim Starling and Erik Moeller
- ad hominem delete without process, recently spread to Meta-Wikipedia
- ad hominem revert allowed to stand, including clearly racist ones, e.g. on Islam articles by Zionists, pointing to articles primarily written BY Zionists
- U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English