User:Jukeboksi/Blog/April2004: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:20, 10 April 2004

10.5.2004

Exciting news with the emergence of Stockepedia, CorpKnowPedia and Consumerpedia. Since we are on the GFDL tip

You mean GFDL Corpus, and yes, you're right.

we don't care worry about them ripping us off like we originally planned to do to what is now known as Wikimedia. I'm sad that our trolls have receded to calling user-accounts, people or semi-people, trollherd or whatever you want or facsists and racists on Consumerium. Consumerium:Itselfs inability to react promptly to such accusations is a disgrace.

The Lowest Troll did in fact respond at Talk:Wikimedia and was refuted - obviously wrong on many counts about the rules of meta, who wrote the material, why it was deleted, and who originated the terms. Erik Moeller is an enemy - there is now apparently a "troll jihad" against him. But the only obvious racist is EN: Wikipedia: User: RickK. There are three or four obvious fascists, but, they may only be fascists in this one silly online context. All "accusations" have been backed up with exact quoted evidence, unlike the ones they make with thelir echo chamber. And all of this is only relevant "here" insofar as it determines who not to work with (like Wikimedia.

The real shame is that Wikimedia exists at all. It is an extreme disgrace.

8.5.2004

Mental note to add w:Packaging and labelling to somewhere. Right now I'm going to go to the movies. Today I've been writing about Consumerpedia and CorpKnowPedia in Wikipedia and the other way around.

Good move; getting more people into those projects, particularly more who can undo stupid sysop decisions by User:DanKeshet, is critical to their survival.

7.5.2004

Trolls suggest filling out Consumerium:Contributor interests so that important economics, math, ecology topics are all covered at least, by end of April. In May we should have a full analysis and good idea of the path.

5.4.2004

I'm taking a couple of days off from this due to exhaustion.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 we don't care worry about them ripping us off like we [http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=265 originally planned to do] to what is now known as [[Wikimedia]]. I'm sad that our [[trolls]] have [[receed|receded]] to calling user-accounts, people or semi-people, [[trollherd]] or whatever you want or facsists and racists on [[Consumerium]]. [[Consumerium:Itself]]s inability to react promptly to such accusations is a disgrace.
-::The [[Lowest Troll]] did in fact respond at [[Talk:Wikimedia]] and was refuted - obviously wrong on many counts about the rules of meta, who wrote the material, why it was deleted, and who originated the terms.  Erik Moeller is an an enemy.  There is now apparently a "troll jihad" against him.  But the only obvious racist is EN: Wikipedia: User: RickK.  There are three or four obvious fascists, but, they may only be fascists in this one silly online context.  All "accusations" have been backed up with exact quoted evidence, unlike the ones they make with thelir [[echo chamber]].  And all of this is only relevant "here" insofar as it determines who not to work with (like [[Wikimedia]].
+::The [[Lowest Troll]] did in fact respond at [[Talk:Wikimedia]] and was refuted - obviously wrong on many counts about the rules of meta, who wrote the material, why it was deleted, and who originated the terms.  Erik Moeller is an [[enemy projects|enemy]] - there is now apparently a "troll jihad" against him.  But the only obvious racist is EN: Wikipedia: User: RickK.  There are three or four obvious fascists, but, they may only be fascists in this one silly online context.  All "accusations" have been backed up with exact quoted evidence, unlike the ones they make with thelir [[echo chamber]].  And all of this is only relevant "here" insofar as it determines who not to work with (like [[Wikimedia]].
 ::The real shame is that [[Wikimedia]] exists at all.  It is an extreme disgrace.