Talk:Research:claim corruption: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(ok it'll only be worse to do later, applying attribution standard ... (by Richard Chilton)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Suggest standard: To [[Research:claim corruption]] is a [[verb phrase]] describing what a user might want to do in one click as a [[command verb]], but [[claims of corruption]] is a [[noun phrase]] for the result). | Suggest standard: To [[Research:claim corruption]] is a [[verb phrase]] describing what a user might want to do in one click as a [[command verb]], but [[claims of corruption]] is a [[noun phrase]] for the result). | ||
It may also be time to stop carrying on a dialogue in the [[page history]] that will make little sense later on when [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] is proven true and [[end Wikimedia|this nonsense is all over]]. AT that time, sticking up for them and against the analysis of [[Wikipedia (Richard Chilton)]] will appear very foolish. | It may also be time to stop carrying on a dialogue in the [[page history]] that will make little sense later on when [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] is proven true and [[end Wikimedia|this nonsense is all over]]. AT that time, sticking up for them and against the analysis of [[Wikipedia (by Richard Chilton)]] will appear very foolish. | ||