Integrity: Difference between revisions

    No edit summary
     
    No edit summary
    Line 1: Line 1:
    '''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]:  if you have about it, it isn't there.  So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of  integrity.
    '''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]:  if you have about it, it isn't there.  So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of  integrity.


    [[Consumerium]] can expect to face following challenges to its integrity:
    [[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity:
    *accusations of [[m:bias|bias]]
    *accusations of [[m:bias|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias]
    *plain [[m:liars |liars]]
    *plain [[m:liars |liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies
    *[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])
    *[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]])
    **[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop  bad sysops]
    **[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop  bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll|troll]])
    **[[w:precedent|precedent]]
    **[[w:precedent|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one
    **[[w:groupthink|groupthink]]
    **[[w:groupthink|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader
    *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems]
    *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view]
    *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda]
    *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us
    *claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view|valid, natural, point of view]]
    *accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly
    [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]]


    How it deals with these will determine if it is trusted for anything else.
    How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else.