Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

    No edit summary
    (more proof of corruption: the worst vandals and vigilantes come in first in the "election")
    Line 4: Line 4:


    :Is [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000365.html being blocked in China] evidence of corruption?  hm.  [[Trolls]] would say no, but, [[sysop power structure]] would have to respect China's [[power structure]] and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|hail to the red faction]]!
    :Is [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000365.html being blocked in China] evidence of corruption?  hm.  [[Trolls]] would say no, but, [[sysop power structure]] would have to respect China's [[power structure]] and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|hail to the red faction]]!
    -------------
    The partially released [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000370.html results] of the [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] "election" proves what [[trolls]] have always said:  it is a front for the [[sysop power structure]]:
    "The top 3 for contributing rep were:
    Anthere  269
    Eloquence 258  ([[Erik Moeller]])
    Maveric149 163  (([[Daniel Mayer]])
    The top 2 for for volunteer rep:
    Angela  345  ([[Auntie Angela]])
    Maveric149 159"  ([[Daniel Mayer]])
    And the only non-[[sysop vandalism|vandal]], [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], barely beat a [[sysop vigilantiism|vigilante]] for the job!  It is obvious that the next "election" will simply put one of the fascists in place, and that they use their [[sysop power structure]] to gain votes for themselves.