Harassment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*[[framing]] | *[[framing]] | ||
These are the [[modus operandi]] of [[Wikimedia]] in particular, well known as a very bad example of [[wiki management]] and probably the worst example of [[wiki governance]] among surviving large wikis. They are resisted strongly by the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] who | These are the [[modus operandi]] of [[Wikimedia]] in particular, well known as a very bad example of [[wiki management]] and probably the worst example of [[wiki governance]] among surviving large wikis. They are resisted strongly by the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] who seek to have those who do these things [[driven off by trolls]]. [[Sysop]]s may or may not consider being driven off by a troll to be harassment, but, usually all that is at stake is the right to edit without opposition, and in any case, reverting edits (even [[ad hominem revert]]) is not a criminal form of harassment <-- this word is defined in law. | ||
The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] should have strict policies against all these forms of harassment. | The [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] should have strict policies against all these forms of harassment. | ||