Worst practices: Difference between revisions
(as->because, because worst practices are defined into existence (and yes that is ontological, but we need not say so over and over again)) |
m (delinking, to avoid involving this important concept with issues that are at least rather controversial and speculative, and have gotten quite personal.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst | *[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst | ||
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | *[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | ||
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[ | *[[Trolls]] probably think and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | ||
*Some people probably think [[animal cruelty]] is worst | |||
Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | ||
Latest revision as of 18:21, 7 September 2004
Worst practices, the opposite of best practices, are factionally defined because different groups think different things are "worst":
- Greens probably think deforestation and other extinction are worst
- Pinks probably think child slavery and spreading disease are worst
- Reds probably think excessive profit and prison labour are worst
- Trolls probably think and sysop vandalism are worst
- Some people probably think animal cruelty is worst
Regardless of these teleological priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many factions, and you can expect a red light to flash as the Consumerium buying signal!