Wikipedia cultist: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(more exact) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''Wikipedia cultist''' believes any of the following obviously foolish things: | A '''Wikipedia cultist''' believes any of the following obviously foolish things: | ||
*that [[Wikipedia]] is a community rather than simply an internet portal | *that [[Wikipedia]] is a community rather than simply an internet portal | ||
*that [[Wikipedia]] is an encyclopedia | *that [[Wikipedia]] is an encyclopedia, even though all its content is in the [[GFDL corpus]] and can be copied anywhere by anyone, and there is no credible source validation | ||
*that [[Jim Wales]] can be referred to as | *that [[sysop vandalism]] somehow improves the [[GFDL corpus]] (it doesn't) and does not [[violate GFDL]] (it does) | ||
*that all [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s must provide links to [[Wikipedia]] as if it were always the authoritative version of any article in the corpus | |||
*that [[Jim Wales]] is a [[GodKing]] or can be referred to same as if that were harmless | |||
*that the [[Wikipedia mailing list]] is actually a source of definitive knowledge or truth suitable to republish in the articles themselves |
Latest revision as of 22:41, 28 August 2005
A Wikipedia cultist believes any of the following obviously foolish things:
- that Wikipedia is a community rather than simply an internet portal
- that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, even though all its content is in the GFDL corpus and can be copied anywhere by anyone, and there is no credible source validation
- that sysop vandalism somehow improves the GFDL corpus (it doesn't) and does not violate GFDL (it does)
- that all GFDL corpus access providers must provide links to Wikipedia as if it were always the authoritative version of any article in the corpus
- that Jim Wales is a GodKing or can be referred to same as if that were harmless
- that the Wikipedia mailing list is actually a source of definitive knowledge or truth suitable to republish in the articles themselves