Talk:Bluetooth: Difference between revisions
(not so good) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST) | Keep an eye out for [[802.16]] Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST) | ||
''- Great. Does that mean that we won't need Wi-Fi, but just Bluetooth capable devices to get on the internet? | |||
I.G.'' | |||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 3 July 2005
I wish that the future WLAN specs and products would use 5Ghz ISM band, like 802.11a and some HiperLANs do, but we'll have to see what's going to happen Juxo 16:50 Jun 5, 2003 (EEST)
- Good news for Bluetooth enthusiasts: IEEE is in the process of developing a new WLAN standard :802.11n. According to Finnish sources the only specs for now are that it will work on 5GHz band and reach 100Mbps. Juxo 15:22, 20 Jan 2004 (EET)
- Bad news for trolls, though. Who can keep up with all the crap broadcast at 100Mbps and correct it?
Keep an eye out for 802.16 Metropolitan Area Networks. 2-10GHz and 10-66GHz bands, very high speeds. Intel and Nokia are involved. I'll write more on this if it seems to be gaining momentum Juxo 13:45 Jul 20, 2003 (EEST)
- Great. Does that mean that we won't need Wi-Fi, but just Bluetooth capable devices to get on the internet? I.G.