Talk:Wikipedia (Reds): Difference between revisions
is structural corruption now past the point of "fixing", or, can Wikipedia by fixed by kicking out Wales, Mayer, Starling, Moeller and Beesley?
((talk about) what Reds think of Wikipedia) |
(is structural corruption now past the point of "fixing", or, can Wikipedia by fixed by kicking out Wales, Mayer, Starling, Moeller and Beesley?) |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
:Probably she just did not share his [[Fox News point of view]]. ;-) | :Probably she just did not share his [[Fox News point of view]]. ;-) | ||
------------ | |||
''From [[Talk:alleged Wikimedia corruption]]:'' | |||
Question: If [[James Wales]], [[Daniel Mayer]], [[Tim Starling]], [[Erik Moeller]] were all kicked out, would the rest of the project stabilize and solve its corruption problems? Or is fated to be run by the likes of [[Angela Beesley]] and her friends? If so then where will the default [[GFDL corpus access provider]] come from? | |||