Talk:Consumerium Research pilot: Difference between revisions
(liars) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]. | Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]. | ||
Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.'' | Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for a definition of the '''Wikiactivist''' and the role of such activist [[faction]]s in [[text liberation]].'' | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 7 September 2004
Since sysop vandals volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to end Wikimedia and its influence, i.e. Bomis's influence, and other corporate influence over GFDL corpus.
Obviously if Consumerium:We cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers and casual liars and harassers like Bomis and Wikimedia and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in Exxon or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall trolling methods that Research Wiki merely amplifies: without determined trolls we have nothing going on, really. See talk:trolling for a definition of the Wikiactivist and the role of such activist factions in text liberation.