Talk:Consumerium Research pilot: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]. | Since [[sysop vandal]]s volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to [[end Wikimedia]] and its influence, i.e. [[Bomis]]'s influence, and other corporate influence over [[GFDL corpus]]. | ||
Obviously if [[Consumerium:We]] cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers like [[Bomis]] and [[Wikimedia]] and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in [[Exxon]] or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall [[trolling]] methods that [[Research Wiki]] merely amplifies: without determined [[trolls]] we have nothing going on, really. ''See [[talk:trolling]] for the '''Wikiactivist'''.'' | |||
Revision as of 22:00, 7 September 2004
Since sysop vandals volunteer as guinea pigs in psychological experiments, we need have no consideration for how the pilot project makes them feel. When it's over it will be fairly obvious how to end Wikimedia and its influence, i.e. Bomis's influence, and other corporate influence over GFDL corpus.
Obviously if Consumerium:We cannot expose the real behaviour of puny trivia mongers like Bomis and Wikimedia and do serious damage to them, then we have no serious chance of putting a dent in Exxon or other bogus charities. It's a good test of robustness of the overall trolling methods that Research Wiki merely amplifies: without determined trolls we have nothing going on, really. See talk:trolling for the Wikiactivist.