User talk:Juxo/Chat Gallery/28.08.2004 with TimStarling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:45, 31 August 2004

Internally it's just implemented as $wgUserTablePrefix, but that's not catchy and aliterative. -- Tim Starling 18:34, 30 Aug 2004 (EEST)

It would be nice if APIs always reflected GUIs, but there are too many morons coding both to make that reliable. Call it the same thing as you do on the user's screen, i.e. single login, using that word/phrase "login" or "log in" consistently, and there will be no confusion about what you mean or what features are being implied.

You can name something as soon as you get off your fat arse and code something. Until then, quit your whinging. -- Tim Starling 10:45, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)

Revision as of 19:06, 30 August 2004 (edit) 142.177.103.156 (talk) (restating the obvious) ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:45, 31 August 2004 (edit) (undo) Tim Starling (talk \| contribs) (reply) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:It would be nice if [[API]]s always reflected [[GUI]]s, but there are too many morons coding both to make that reliable. Call it the same thing as you do on the user's screen, i.e. [[single login]], using that word/phrase "login" or "log in" consistently, and there will be no confusion about what you mean or what features are being implied.		:It would be nice if [[API]]s always reflected [[GUI]]s, but there are too many morons coding both to make that reliable. Call it the same thing as you do on the user's screen, i.e. [[single login]], using that word/phrase "login" or "log in" consistently, and there will be no confusion about what you mean or what features are being implied.

			::You can name something as soon as you get off your fat arse and code something. Until then, quit your whinging. -- [[User:Tim Starling\|Tim Starling]] 10:45, 31 Aug 2004 (EEST)