Groupthink: Difference between revisions

Groupthink (edit)

114 bytes added , 21 July 2004

no edit summary

Anonymous user

Revision as of 07:08, 21 July 2004 (edit) 142.177.103.123 (talk) (yes indeed) ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:09, 21 July 2004 (edit) (undo) 142.177.103.123 (talk) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::: Is ''moron'' used as an argument here in this place? Are different opinions not welcome? In competition factions define themselves by a lot of equivalence and a bit of negation. There R very rarely new ideas 2 solve existing problems. T permanent conflict enforces redrawing 2 save territory and 2 avoid attacking T hard problems.		::: Is ''moron'' used as an argument here in this place? Are different opinions not welcome? In competition factions define themselves by a lot of equivalence and a bit of negation. There R very rarely new ideas 2 solve existing problems. T permanent conflict enforces redrawing 2 save territory and 2 avoid attacking T hard problems.

	::::ok so [[representative democracy]] has problems including bad border choices - ~~but~~ yes ''moron'' is used as an argument especially by [[trolls]] who learned it from the [[sysop power structure]] that first called them that		::::ok so [[representative democracy]] has problems including bad border choices - yes ''moron'' is used as an argument especially by [[trolls]] who learned it from the [[sysop power structure]] that first called them that. and this is not a "place" it is a [[wiki]]. Yes different opinions are welcome but you most not expect politeness.