Groupthink: Difference between revisions

Groupthink (edit)

Revision as of 07:43, 20 July 2004

2 bytes removed , 20 July 2004

no edit summary

Anonymous user

62.46.164.54

Revision as of 07:42, 20 July 2004 (edit) 62.46.164.54 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:43, 20 July 2004 (edit) (undo) 62.46.164.54 (talk) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::It only seems worse to morons: factions are smaller than the larger group they are trying to steer, and since they are forced to accept some rules on how they compete with each other to do that steering, you have more acceptance of reciprocity and equality of factions (trying "insider vs. outsider" for unfair treatment!), and smaller groups that are at least capable of seeing how their biases fit together.		::It only seems worse to morons: factions are smaller than the larger group they are trying to steer, and since they are forced to accept some rules on how they compete with each other to do that steering, you have more acceptance of reciprocity and equality of factions (trying "insider vs. outsider" for unfair treatment!), and smaller groups that are at least capable of seeing how their biases fit together.

	: Is ''moron'' used as an argument here in this place? Are different opinions not welcome? In competition factions define themselves by a lot of equivalence and a bit of negation. There R very rarely new ideas 2 solve existing problems. ~~The~~ permanent conflict enforces redrawing 2 save territory and 2 avoid attacking T hard problems.		: Is ''moron'' used as an argument here in this place? Are different opinions not welcome? In competition factions define themselves by a lot of equivalence and a bit of negation. There R very rarely new ideas 2 solve existing problems. T permanent conflict enforces redrawing 2 save territory and 2 avoid attacking T hard problems.