Talk:Consumerium social club: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(more analogies) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
What's clear is, the cheerleaders and the student council aren't the same folks, and shouldn't be selected by the same method. | What's clear is, the cheerleaders and the student council aren't the same folks, and shouldn't be selected by the same method. | ||
:A [[social club]] (cheerleaders) and a [[faction]] (student council) are obviously different. | |||
-------------- | -------------- | ||
Also see [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Metaweb:social_club Metaweb social club] which has a more elaborated discussion and analogies. | Also see [http://www.metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Metaweb:social_club Metaweb social club] which has a more elaborated discussion and analogies. | ||
--------------- | |||
Much of this is out of date, now that [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Wikimedia Wikimedia] exists and its (corrupt, conflicted) board structure is clear. There is now no chance to get an [[independent board]] at Wikimedia, which simply shows how critical these early decisions on terminology and roles are. | |||
-------------- | |||
Does listing [[interests of Consumerium contributors]] or [[Consumerium:contributor interests]] imply that a [[Consumerium Social Club]] ([[proper name]]) already exists? Or is this a way to figure out who's in what [[faction]]? | |||