Trust model: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(hard to define exactly but, has to be done) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It | A '''trust model''' is just a map of who [[trust]]s who, when and in what circumstances. It claims '''authoritative integrity''', meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting. It is not [[reputation]] although reputation can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe. However it does not ''establish'' authoritative integrity, that takes an [[audit]] process, and that process has a form of [[investigative integrity]]. | ||
[[Trademark]], [[standard label]]s and anything that you can [[audit]] is believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't. | |||
To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]]. | To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as [[propaganda]]. | ||
Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]]. | Any [[revenue model]] is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a [[self-funding]] project, but also to the [[Consumerium developers]]. | ||
Revision as of 01:05, 25 November 2003
A trust model is just a map of who trusts who, when and in what circumstances. It claims authoritative integrity, meaning, you are actually trusting who you think you are trusting. It is not reputation although reputation can play a major role in deciding whose assertions to believe. However it does not establish authoritative integrity, that takes an audit process, and that process has a form of investigative integrity.
Trademark, standard labels and anything that you can audit is believed to have some degree of this integrity, or people wouldn't act one way when they saw the mark/label, and another way when they don't.
To understand the contrast, consider what happens when you see a term on a label like "fun" or "new" or "more" or "clean" on a label. There is no control or trust model behind these words, so you dismiss them as propaganda.
Any revenue model is based on some assumptions about a trust model. This is particularly important in a self-funding project, but also to the Consumerium developers.