Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
</tr>
</tr>
<td>
<td>
*Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers
*Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers reliably
*PHP based
*PHP based
*Proven to perform well under heavy load - but with hard limits
*Proven to perform well under heavy load - but with hard limits
Line 20: Line 20:
</td>
</td>
<td>
<td>
*Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers
*Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers at all - form for describing [[wiki feature request]] incomprehensible even to gurus.
*PHP based
*PHP based
*meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]], [[RDF]]
*meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]], [[RDF]]
Line 29: Line 29:
*Polls built in
*Polls built in
*Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
*Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
*supports ALL databases not just MySQL
*supports Postgres, Oracle, Sybase and SQLite (built in PHP 5.0!) databases not just MySQL - strategic to integrate with some [[essential projects]]
*developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
*developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
</td>
</td>
Anonymous user