Talk:NNPOV: Difference between revisions
(nonsense to delete) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is nonsense. Even/especially "[[NPOV]]" is not "neutral". Delete this please, there has been absolutely no demand or mention of it anywhere, so the concept is obviously not of much use. | This is nonsense. Even/especially "[[NPOV]]" is not "neutral". Delete this please, there has been absolutely no demand or mention of it anywhere, so the concept is obviously not of much use. | ||
:[[Trolls]] propose that this "NNPOV" is just [[God's Eye view]] in disguise, and point to the nonsense idea that "research and opinion can be differentiated objectively" as an example of it polluting [[Consumerium]]. Now a redirect to explain this. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 30 June 2004
This is nonsense. Even/especially "NPOV" is not "neutral". Delete this please, there has been absolutely no demand or mention of it anywhere, so the concept is obviously not of much use.
- Trolls propose that this "NNPOV" is just God's Eye view in disguise, and point to the nonsense idea that "research and opinion can be differentiated objectively" as an example of it polluting Consumerium. Now a redirect to explain this.