Consumerium:Neutral point of view: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:30, 2 July 2004

Redirect to:

Revision as of 22:54, 25 June 2004 (edit) 142.177.103.70 (talk) (explaining role of NTPOV and CPOV in forming NPOV, how systemic bias makes NPOV insufficient) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:30, 2 July 2004 (edit) (undo) 142.177.108.38 (talk) (#REDIRECT Consumerium:dispute)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~All articles in~~ [[~~Research Wiki~~]] should be [[NPOV]], which is a descriptive meaning "any statement which is disputed must be attributed." Facts that are not disputed in practice need not be attributed. There may be a need to question some facts randomly or systematically from a [[New Troll point of view]] just to make sure that no sources are overtrusted and no [[common sense]] is accidentally being placed in articles. NPOV alone is not enough of a prescription, because of the [[systemic bias]] of editors and contributors.		#REDIRECT [[Consumerium:dispute]]

	Statements of the form "X is often asserted to be true, but is not true" might be in the main article if they are very prevalent beliefs, but usually will be moved to another space devoted to [[Critical point of view]], e.g. [[talk page]].