Consumerium Governance Organization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Consumerium Governance Organization''' should try to get as close as it can to a totally [[Transparent Consumerium]]. When | The '''Consumerium Governance Organization''' is the last step of [[Consumerium governance]]. It should try to get as close as it can to create a totally [[Transparent Consumerium]] based on a [[object use protocol]] applied to real objects. This would make it easy to use infrastructure that you didn't own, as long as the network retained [[infrastructure owners trust]] and was running... so a user could pick up at [[point of purchase]] the device required to [[swipe the barcode]], and it would not necessarily be "his" or belong to the "store". It might for instance come out of a [[vending machine]] and be returned to it. The potential of it not being returned, requires an organization to insure it. | ||
There is no such thing as an organization or institution that doesn't fail. Nor is there any such thing as a technology that doesn't require some sort of organizational supervision. Even [[GNU]] has to update its licenses when new legal problems are discovered. The [[IETF]] has to update technical standards. | |||
Structurally, the '''CGO''' might resemble these, more so than the [[W3]] or [[X/Open]], but more like W3 or X/Open, it may need for instance to hold some [[patent]] or [[trademark]] rights to function, and ensure improvements that the [[Consumerium community]] comes up with, continue to "belong" to [[Consumerium:Itself]] and can be leveraged to keep competing networks from developing. This does NOT however mean keeping competitors from taking over THIS network. That must be possible, indeed, encouraged. This is the only way to make a standard work and spread and be trusted. It must be open competition to implement and manage it better. This means constantly obsoleting its own organization, and looking for ways to subvert itself. | |||
When '''CGO''' fails and falls victim to [[groupthink]], as all institutions and organizations do, it should be easy for another organization to take the next steps. Effectively the only role of the CGO is to retain [[infrastructure owners trust]] for long enough to make it impossible to contain the network. After which point, new [[server box]]es can so easily be deployed, that, it doesn't matter, and, anyone can make the service function. | |||
An interim step towards this would be a [[two party system]] where the [[Consumerium community]] itself chooses the [[Consumerium board]], using an [[adversarial process]]. So politically, the CGO looks like a government in a multi-party democracy. Just like the United States Government, it includes the various founding figures in a competing architecture of running for the offices under a common [[Consumerium Constitution]] that prevents interference with any more [[Transparent Consumerium]]. No matter who actually comes to "invent" it. | |||
Revision as of 01:43, 27 October 2003
The Consumerium Governance Organization is the last step of Consumerium governance. It should try to get as close as it can to create a totally Transparent Consumerium based on a object use protocol applied to real objects. This would make it easy to use infrastructure that you didn't own, as long as the network retained infrastructure owners trust and was running... so a user could pick up at point of purchase the device required to swipe the barcode, and it would not necessarily be "his" or belong to the "store". It might for instance come out of a vending machine and be returned to it. The potential of it not being returned, requires an organization to insure it.
There is no such thing as an organization or institution that doesn't fail. Nor is there any such thing as a technology that doesn't require some sort of organizational supervision. Even GNU has to update its licenses when new legal problems are discovered. The IETF has to update technical standards. Structurally, the CGO might resemble these, more so than the W3 or X/Open, but more like W3 or X/Open, it may need for instance to hold some patent or trademark rights to function, and ensure improvements that the Consumerium community comes up with, continue to "belong" to Consumerium:Itself and can be leveraged to keep competing networks from developing. This does NOT however mean keeping competitors from taking over THIS network. That must be possible, indeed, encouraged. This is the only way to make a standard work and spread and be trusted. It must be open competition to implement and manage it better. This means constantly obsoleting its own organization, and looking for ways to subvert itself.
When CGO fails and falls victim to groupthink, as all institutions and organizations do, it should be easy for another organization to take the next steps. Effectively the only role of the CGO is to retain infrastructure owners trust for long enough to make it impossible to contain the network. After which point, new server boxes can so easily be deployed, that, it doesn't matter, and, anyone can make the service function.
An interim step towards this would be a two party system where the Consumerium community itself chooses the Consumerium board, using an adversarial process. So politically, the CGO looks like a government in a multi-party democracy. Just like the United States Government, it includes the various founding figures in a competing architecture of running for the offices under a common Consumerium Constitution that prevents interference with any more Transparent Consumerium. No matter who actually comes to "invent" it.