|
|
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Evidence of '''Wikimedia corruption''' includes:
| | #REDIRECT [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] |
| | |
| *false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
| |
| *[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
| |
| *no [[independent board]] free of influence from [[Bomis.com]]
| |
| *"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made
| |
| *users not consulted when user environment changes
| |
| *no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
| |
| *[[libel chill]] by Wales
| |
| *solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
| |
| *withholding of information regarding link transit at [[Wikipedia]] which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a [[search engine]] like Bomis
| |
| *[[outing]] and concomitant [[libel]] based on [[echo chamber]] claims
| |
| *[[sysop vandalism]] most notably by [[Auntie Angela]]
| |
| *[[sysop vigilantiism]] and more serious [[developer vigilantiism]], notably by Tim Starling and Erik Moeller
| |
| *[[ad hominem delete]] without process, recently spread to [[Meta-Wikipedia]]
| |
| *[[ad hominem revert]] allowed to stand, including clearly racist ones, e.g. on Islam articles by Zionists, pointing to articles primarily written BY Zionists
| |
| *U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English
| |