Talk:Neutrality dispute: Difference between revisions
still the best title
No edit summary |
(still the best title) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[n:]] to mean "best neutral view]] is very appealing. It would replace [[w:]] and would open the possibility of using [[Metaweb]] or another Wikipedia even, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]]. In fact the lookup could be per article with some hacks to the code. Though [[mediawiki]] will never do this, it being under the control of fascists, it seems easy to do it in [[tikiwiki]] or [[MoinMoin]], which are far better candidates for the [[Content Wiki]] anyway. | [[n:]] to mean "best neutral view]] is very appealing. It would replace [[w:]] and would open the possibility of using [[Metaweb]] or another Wikipedia even, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]]. In fact the lookup could be per article with some hacks to the code. Though [[mediawiki]] will never do this, it being under the control of fascists, it seems easy to do it in [[tikiwiki]] or [[MoinMoin]], which are far better candidates for the [[Content Wiki]] anyway. | ||
---------- | |||
This is still the wisest article - especially the redirect from [[neutral point of view]]. NPOV is not a noun describing a state, it only implies a process of detecting neutrality disputes, and it does not define that process in any way. So [[Consumerium:neutral point of view]] should redirect to [[Consumerium:dispute]] where all the issues and disputes are explained. | |||