Worst practices: Difference between revisions
stopping worst practices is more teleological than ontological |
m delinking, to avoid involving this important concept with issues that are at least rather controversial and speculative, and have gotten quite personal. |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are | '''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are [[factionally defined]] because different groups think different things are "worst": | ||
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | *[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | ||
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst | *[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst | ||
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | *[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | ||
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[ | *[[Trolls]] probably think and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | ||
*Some people probably think [[animal cruelty]] is worst | |||
Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | ||