Worst practices: Difference between revisions
(well roared, 142.177) |
m (delinking, to avoid involving this important concept with issues that are at least rather controversial and speculative, and have gotten quite personal.) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are | '''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are [[factionally defined]] because different groups think different things are "worst": | ||
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | *[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | ||
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst | *[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst | ||
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | *[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | ||
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[ | *[[Trolls]] probably think and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | ||
*Some people probably think [[animal cruelty]] is worst | |||
Regardless of these | Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! |
Latest revision as of 18:21, 7 September 2004
Worst practices, the opposite of best practices, are factionally defined because different groups think different things are "worst":
- Greens probably think deforestation and other extinction are worst
- Pinks probably think child slavery and spreading disease are worst
- Reds probably think excessive profit and prison labour are worst
- Trolls probably think and sysop vandalism are worst
- Some people probably think animal cruelty is worst
Regardless of these teleological priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many factions, and you can expect a red light to flash as the Consumerium buying signal!