Worst practices: Difference between revisions

27 bytes removed ,  7 September 2004
m
delinking, to avoid involving this important concept with issues that are at least rather controversial and speculative, and have gotten quite personal.
(well roared, 142.177)
m (delinking, to avoid involving this important concept with issues that are at least rather controversial and speculative, and have gotten quite personal.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are ontologically [[factionally defined]] as ontologically different groups think different ontologically things are ontologically "worst":
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are [[factionally defined]] because different groups think different things are "worst":


*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst
*[[Trolls]] probably think and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst
*Some people probably think [[animal cruelty]] is worst


Regardless of these ontological priorities, rack up enough ontological "worst" and you can expect an ontological [[red light]] to flash as your ontological  [[Consumerium buying signal]]!
Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]!
10

edits