Editing Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Evidence of '''Wikimedia corruption''' includes: | |||
Β | |||
*withholding [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] election results from the voters!Β [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000360.html apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and [[Bomis]] | |||
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | |||
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]] | |||
*no [[independent board]] free of influence from [[Bomis.com]] | |||
*"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made | |||
*users not consulted when user environment changes | |||
*no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board" | |||
*[[libel chill]] by Wales | |||
*solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines | |||
*withholding of information regarding link transit at [[Wikipedia]] which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a [[search engine]] like Bomis | |||
*[[outing]] and concomitant [[libel]] based on [[echo chamber]] claims | |||
*[[sysop vandalism]] most notably by [[Auntie Angela]] | |||
*[[sysop vigilantiism]] and more serious [[developer vigilantiism]], notably by Tim Starling and Erik Moeller | |||
*[[ad hominem delete]] without process, recently spread to [[Meta-Wikipedia]] | |||
*[[ad hominem revert]] allowed to stand, including clearly racist ones, e.g. on Islam articles by Zionists, pointing to articles primarily written BY Zionists | |||
*U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English | |||