Editing Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
142, please provide specifics and references for these claims. | |||
:Doing so for new claims; However, since lies, [[libel]] and [[echo chamber]] fraud are freely spread on [[vile mailing list]]s run by [[Wikimedia]] without any such specifics or references, it might be abusive to require such documentation from their opponents; most specific references are in the sub-articles using the most infamous [[Wikimedia]] clowns as the universal bad example for how not to do [[wiki governance]]. | |||
:Is [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000365.html being blocked in China] evidence of corruption? hm. [[Trolls]] would say no, but, [[sysop power structure]] would have to respect China's [[power structure]] and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|hail to the red faction]]! | |||
---- | |||
The partially released [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000370.html results] of the [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] "election" proves what [[trolls]] have always said: it is a front for the [[sysop power structure]]: | |||
"The top 3 for contributing rep were: | |||
Anthere 269 | |||
Eloquence 258 ([[Erik Moeller]]) | |||
Maveric149 163 (([[Daniel Mayer]]) | |||
The top 2 for for volunteer rep: | |||
Angela 345 ([[Auntie Angela]]) | |||
Maveric149 159" ([[Daniel Mayer]]) |