Editing Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption

142, please provide specifics and references for these claims.

:Doing so for new claims;  However, since lies, [[libel]] and [[echo chamber]] fraud are freely spread on [[vile mailing list]]s run by [[Wikimedia]] without any such specifics or references, it might be abusive to require such documentation from their opponents;  most specific references are in the sub-articles using the most infamous [[Wikimedia]] clowns as the universal bad example for how not to do [[wiki governance]].

:Is [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000365.html being blocked in China] evidence of corruption?  hm.  [[Trolls]] would say no, but, [[sysop power structure]] would have to respect China's [[power structure]] and their pet sysops who are their friends in fascist power plays. - [[w:User:Plato/red_faction|hail to the red faction]]!

-------------

The partially released [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000370.html results] of the [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] "election" proves what [[trolls]] have always said:  it is a front for the [[sysop power structure]]:

"The top 3 for contributing rep were:

Anthere  269
Eloquence 258  ([[Erik Moeller]])
Maveric149 163  (([[Daniel Mayer]])

The top 2 for for volunteer rep:

Angela  345  ([[Auntie Angela]])
Maveric149 159"  ([[Daniel Mayer]])

And the only non-[[sysop vandalism|vandal]], [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], barely beat a [[sysop vigilantiism|vigilante]] for the job!  It is obvious that the next "election" will simply put one of the fascists in place, and that they use their [[sysop power structure]] to gain votes for themselves.