Editing Talk:Industrial ecology
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
When these four are done, there is no such thing as "waste" because all waste is a "resource" to something else, and there is no such thing as "products" or even "commodities" since they are defined as harvesting, processing, distributing, collecting and disposal services that happen to provide services to users in between. This is the most powerful idea, since [[product lifecycle]] must be considered by the maker not the user. | When these four are done, there is no such thing as "waste" because all waste is a "resource" to something else, and there is no such thing as "products" or even "commodities" since they are defined as harvesting, processing, distributing, collecting and disposal services that happen to provide services to users in between. This is the most powerful idea, since [[product lifecycle]] must be considered by the maker not the user. | ||
Is there a [[w:industrial ecology]] article in wikipedia? There should also be [[w:product stewardship]] and [[w:service ecology]] which are the more advanced ideas of | Is there a [[w:industrial ecology]] article in wikipedia? There should also be [[w:product stewardship]] and [[w:service ecology]] which are the more advanced ideas of a. | ||
:nope. none. There is not even an article on waste...but that's fair since "waste" is just a pov :-) | :nope. none. There is not even an article on waste...but that's fair since "waste" is just a pov :-) | ||