Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| *redefining all products as services | | *redefining all products as services |
|
| |
|
| :really ? we need these four then
| | When these four are done, there is no such thing as "waste" because all waste is a "resource" to something else, and there is no such thing as "products" or even "commodities" since they are defined as harvesting, processing, distributing, collecting and disposal services that happen to provide services to users in between. This is the most powerful idea. |
|
| |
|
| When these four are done, there is no such thing as "waste" because all waste is a "resource" to something else, and there is no such thing as "products" or even "commodities" since they are defined as harvesting, processing, distributing, collecting and disposal services that happen to provide services to users in between. This is the most powerful idea, since [[product lifecycle]] must be considered by the maker not the user.
| | Is there a [[w:industrial ecology]] article in wikipedia? |
| | |
| Is there a [[w:industrial ecology]] article in wikipedia? There should also be [[w:product stewardship]] and [[w:service ecology]] which are the more advanced ideas of an assessment. | |
| | |
| :nope. none. There is not even an article on waste...but that's fair since "waste" is just a pov :-)
| |