Editing Identifying people

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Having identification data on someones person in the system without:  
Having identification data on someones person in the system without:  


A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where?  how?  when?)
A) Explicit consent from the person in question  
:Good questions. We must determine how to determine someone claiming to be someone is really that someone.


or  
or  
Line 8: Line 7:
B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.)
B) The person being a [[publicly known person]] (eg. [[executive]]s ([[VP]], [[CEO]]...) that can be looked up by [[shareholder]]s or in the [[media]] or [[company register]]s, or [[shareholder]]s that can be looked up in [[stock exchange]] information systems or [[company register]]s or other people appearing in well known [[publication]]s ([[tv]], [[radio]], [[magazine]]s, [[news paper]]s or well established digital sources.)


is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that.  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]].  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 15:11 Apr 25, 2003 (EEST)
 
:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil".  But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done".  You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]".  Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]].  So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think.  Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data.  Fair?
 
----
==See also:==
 
* [[Identifying companies]]
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)