Editing Talk:Wiki witchhunt

'''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''

:There is extremely strong circumstantial evidence that [[Wikimedia]] and [[MediaWiki]] promoters were directly involved in [[vandalbot]] attacks just before the final [[denial of service attack]].  It is not clear whether this is what discouraged Recyclopedia's founder from continuing, but it seems likely.  This is far more valid than a "conspiracy theory".

If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt

:Woops censored by [[sysop vandalism]] via [[denial of service attack]] via [[vandalbot]] via Tim... ooh let's not go there.

-------------

Seems it ''is'' happening here, with emergence of articles like [[Craig Hubley]].  How should [[Consumerium:We|we]] respond?  

Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]?  If so what good is it?

--------------

It seems entirely reasonable to assume that someone is from a [[faction]] espousing [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] if they dredge up old junk articles that have no credibility at all and republish them here after they've died and started to rot.  That is neither [[New Troll point of view]] nor is calling someone an advocate of that [[SVpov]] a [[wiki witchhunt]]:  there has been no attempt at [[outing]] or even relating the whole thing to an overall strategy by the [[Wikipedia]] [[sysop power structure]].