Editing Talk:Sysopism

This was [[GFDL]]'d at [[Recyclopedia]];  Since it's such a critical issue to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], probably most or all the links here need some comment, maybe just one liners to explain their relevance, with a link to the "[[sysop power structure]]-approved" SPSA/[[Wikipedia]] version.
----
Moved from article

:Some experts expect that the first acts of violence against online sysops are quite near at hand, and will be seen before the end of [[2004]].

::If I claim that this puts the anticipation hat on for people who admire the capacity to comprehend and realize violent behaviour then this looks like a threat, not a [[spun threat|spun one]] from one [[faction]] view point. The anticipation by those who admire violent resistance to some power presents a clear threat to another faction that supports [[Sysopism]] as a necessary evil or no evil after all--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:10, 14 Apr 2004 (EEST)

:::That is their problem not ours, but, fair enough.  It doesn't have to be on our radar here necessarily.  Though it's hard to imagine that comments made in online media won't be just as inflammatory and contentious as those made on radio or TV or in print, when online media statements are just as important.

:Similar predictions were made regarding deaths of protestors in the [[anti-globalization movement]], which were realized in [[Genoa]] in late [[2001]].

::I don't know the expression in English, but this is not a good thing to record since proclamations can be the cause of the manifestation of the proclamation. It's a paradoxical, sorta timetravel thing where causality moves in reverse direction in time, taken that time exists. So to keep this sysop from severely force feeding you [[Kit-Kat McFlurry]] I suggest you stop copying articles of such high controversy points and predictions from [[Recyclopedia]]. So put it short no more threats on people's physical safety, mmkay? For the sake of our psyche, please.--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:10, 14 Apr 2004 (EEST)~

:::[[Trolls]] don't know what is controversial or not, but will trust [[Lowest Troll]] judgement on this point.  We don't owe the dirty sysops any warning, so, it's fine with us if this is omitted.