Editing Talk:Sysop vigilantiism

Isn't this a typo and should be [[Sysop vigilantism]]. For all I care this stuff should all be collated to [[AWR]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:18, 28 Feb 2004 (EET)

:Nope, there are definitely two syllables there, as it means vigilante-ism.  At least it is always pronounced with two syllables.

:It can't be one of your [[AWR]] unless you think the [[Wikipedia]] [[GodKing]] makes such rants, and is also a [[142.X.X.X]].  Which is not out of the question.  But he invented the word, not us, and he said it happened, not us.

-----------

"When we have the situation that some individual is suspected of being 
the reincarnation of a banned user, many, including some sysops start by 
acting on their suspicions rather than seeking out hard evidence.  There 
is rarely a need for hasty action when the suspect is confining his 
activities to a handful of articles; there will always be time to fix 
this when the issue is clarified.

... incessant gnattering about whether someone's edits resemble those of a banned user serves no useful purpose....

There is a serious need for some people to start understanding what 
standards of proof are all about." - [[Ray Saintonge]][http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013498.html]