Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Settings
About Consumerium development wiki
Disclaimers
Consumerium development wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Editing
Talk:Neutrality dispute
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[n:]] to mean "best neutral view]] is very appealing. It would replace [[w:]] and would open the possibility of using [[Metaweb]] or another Wikipedia even, like [[Simple English Wikipedia]]. In fact the lookup could be per article with some hacks to the code. Though [[mediawiki]] will never do this, it being under the control of fascists, it seems easy to do it in [[tikiwiki]] or [[MoinMoin]], which are far better candidates for the [[Content Wiki]] anyway. ---------- This is still the wisest article - especially the redirect from [[neutral point of view]]. NPOV is not a noun describing a state, it only implies a process of detecting neutrality disputes, and it does not define that process in any way. So [[Consumerium:neutral point of view]] should redirect to [[Consumerium:dispute]] where all the issues and disputes are explained.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Consumerium:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Return to "Neutrality dispute" page.